As we consider this question, we see that worst place is not occupied when it is readily apparent. For instance. Having members in the unit who actively kill others makes a unit bad. If a soldier begins shooting others (possibly some other bad soldiers) then after that soldier is removed, the unit gets better. The real problematic situation is when a unit has soldiers that get others killed (in a variety of ways, arrogance, stupidity, negligence). In this case, these soldiers are not always removed and the continue to make the unit bad. A good way to not identify bad soldiers is after people are killed you have the unit self evaluate. For instance, after a bunch of soldiers were wounded, the after action critique the unit held said that it did not matter if radios worked. Obviously they didn't invite a SEAL team to the critique because everyone of them are wired in and if their "comms" go down, they are concerned(I digress since I am not talking about the best military units)
TO BE CONTINUED
Monday, June 18, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
http://WWW.thegodmurders.Com/id144.HTML
Post a Comment