Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Merry Christmas

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Guest Contributor-The GREATEST leader I have ever seen in my entire lifetime".

Comment link From: http://WWW.thegodmurders.Com/id144.HTML
is posted here for the advancement of politically incorrect speach.

This is Gary DeVaney. (Captain, USAR retired)

From: http://WWW.thegodmurders.Com/id144.HTML

I have thought long and hard about it and have come to the conclusion that:

George W. Bush is the GREATEST leader I have ever seen in my entire lifetime.

The GREATEST leader is the effective leader whose will can successfully break, kill or control all other's wills under all circumstances.

To date, that is exactly what President George W. Bush has successfully done. His will leads, and he successfully gets results through others.

I cannot break his will to end the war he started. Neither can you. Neither can his fellow Republicans - nor the Democrats. Certainly his chosen enemy cannot break his will. They will continue to die trying.

Up to now, Bush has successfully controlled the wills of all the American people whose wills then, in turn, successfully control the wills of the rest of the World.

The USA has become like Hitler's Nazis - except we have the weapons, the technology and the International Banker's money to do it all.

Nothing breaks or controls human wills faster than killing a million or so people, so far. That heinous "accomplishment" fearfully controls a lot of wills.

All previous US Presidents combined have borrowed about 1.01 trillion dollars up to the year 2000.

President George W. Bush alone has borrowed about 1.05 trillion dollars since the year 2000. (CNN News: 6-18-2007)

To make it perfectly clear, President George W. Bush has borrowed more money from the International Bankers than all the previous US Presidents have borrowed combined. That makes the International Bankers very happy because the money is being spent to fulfill their agenda.

George W. Bush is the GREATEST leader I have ever seen. Like God, his will and deeds are not subject to law.

I personally am beaten. My will is broken, defeated. I cannot break President Bush's will and end all his killing. Contrary to corporate media propaganda, his will indicates that the killing has just begun.

Neither you nor I can break his will to end the New World Order / One World Government agenda. We have all been beaten and we all are controlled by his will. "Free-will" is over.

All together now: "His will be done".

The Biblical God must be proud of His appointed leader, President George W. Bush, who may go down in history as the GREATEST leader ever.

Regrets, Gary DeVaney

Monday, June 18, 2007

The A, B, Cs of legal ethics

Lawyers like to talk about ethics. The non-lawyer can have a difficult task trying to quantify where an attorney fits in on the ethical scale. Here is my rating system to try to help you along.


"I have spent all my life under a communist regime and I will tell you that a society without any objective legal scale is a terrible one indeed. But a society with no other scale but the legal one is not quite worthy of man either. A society which is based on the letter of the law and never reaches any higher is taking very scarce advantage of the high level of human possibilities.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Grade A - An A can not be achieved in the present legal system because of its flaws- that is why I have the Solzhenitsyn quote. (Go to the link to read his complete statement) Ironically, primitive people had the right idea when they would arbitrate disputes with extended family and attempted to work out liveable solutions. For an A - truth and mercy have to be combined to make justice. Participants have to spill their guts and all facts must be laid bare. Americans should be arbitrated family disputes such as custody and visitation since the parties must live with the results for decades.

Grade B - This is given to those attorneys who follow the ABA Rules of Professional Responsibility. (link?) Inherent in ethical practice is the right of privilege-an attorney does not have to reveal the truth which was revealed by a client. Many injustices result thereby.

Grade C- This is known as the sharp practice. The attorney is really a jerk, he follows the rules but is moralely bankrupt. For instance, serving papers on someone at Friday close of business for a Friday hearing at 10 AM the next week. The party will be unable to try to get an attorney until Monday and must consult by Thursday or be unprepared.

Grade D - This is the unactionable zone for unethical behavior. The standard to punish a lawyer is Clear, Congent, and Compelling evidence. This is almost to the extent of "beyond reasonable doubt". A hard standard to prove.

Grade E - This is the actionable zone. The conduct is so bad and blatent that you are disbarred and disgraced. For instance, Mike Nifong, had made statements recorded by video and sound that the bar alleged were unethical...Hard to beat video evidence, in fact he stipulated to the facts of the videos before his hearing.


How do you identify the worst military unit in the US Army?

As we consider this question, we see that worst place is not occupied when it is readily apparent. For instance. Having members in the unit who actively kill others makes a unit bad. If a soldier begins shooting others (possibly some other bad soldiers) then after that soldier is removed, the unit gets better. The real problematic situation is when a unit has soldiers that get others killed (in a variety of ways, arrogance, stupidity, negligence). In this case, these soldiers are not always removed and the continue to make the unit bad. A good way to not identify bad soldiers is after people are killed you have the unit self evaluate. For instance, after a bunch of soldiers were wounded, the after action critique the unit held said that it did not matter if radios worked. Obviously they didn't invite a SEAL team to the critique because everyone of them are wired in and if their "comms" go down, they are concerned(I digress since I am not talking about the best military units)

Friday, June 15, 2007

What is a law abiding citizen?

What is a law abiding citizen?


The Honorable Thing

I am certain there is a threshhold for popular support wherein a politician resigns.

So I am certain that if a senatorial majority leader was below 20% approval rating and a president was around 30% approval rating, they would agree to do the honorable thing and resign.

What we need is Love Crime Legislation NOW!

Important Hate Crime legislation is pending but what about Love Crime legislation--not even on the table. Haven't you ever heard the statement, he deserves a stiff beating. Normally, assault could engender a year in jail, but if someone deserves it and you have the love in your heart to administer it, shouldn't there be less punishment all the way up to a reward? Before we begin, it should be noted that present Hate Crime Legislation is flawed. It was pointed out quite correctly that when Govenor Bush tried to contend that the death penalty was enough punishment for a hate crime, it was like the murder had occurred all over again.. We are learning that the US Constitution supports torture at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and well worth the effort to determine what will bring the most pain such as being forced to watch reruns of Jerry Springer or Oprah, the lame ending of the Sopranos, or Geico Caveman commercials.

It was Socrates, about 2400 years ago (Hammurabi's Code 1700 BC, the Old Testament, etc did not mention this concept) who proposed using the Love Crime legislation as a basis for sentencing. At his sentencing after being convicted of corrupting the youth, Socrates accusers proposed the death penalty. Socrates, using the love crime concept, proposed that he be rewarded. At that time, some of the unenlightened jury were infuriated and they voted for death, but of course in our enlightened age with all our wisdom and knowledge I am certain that a majority will support love crime legislation and most likely it has not passed because of an oversight.